Obama Blog 08

About this Anti Obama blog

This blog is a project by two staunch conservatives who have decided to have a little fun during the 08 election cycle. Exactly how this website will progress over the next year is entirely up in the air. We hope to have lots of input from fellow bloggers and readers. If you have any ideas or funny email that you would care to pass along we would love to take a look.

We do have a few goals that we hope to achieve with this blog.

  1. Our main goal with this website is to have fun. If you are not having fun, then well, this corner of the internet is probably not your neck of the woods.
  2. We hope to mix in a large dose of humor and sarcasm around topics that we feel strongly about.
  3. We hope to rank really high for Obama related google queries.

How you can help.
If you are a conservative or would just like to help us achieve our goal of ranking well in the search engines, then please give us a link from your blog, website, or forum with the word Obama somewhere in the anchor text. If you have any questions then please leave a comment and we will get back to you.

30 Responses to “About this Anti Obama blog”

Chris Ford wrote a comment on January 4, 2008

Why is it that the national conservative and/or “fair and balance” press has not called attention to the obvious dishonesty and pandering Obama is doing to minority groups in this country? Obama is NOT black. He is 1/2 black and 1/2 White…and it is his white American ancestry that qualifies him to even run for the Presidency, since his black father is from Kenya, (and aparently abandoned he ad his mother when he was 2). Obviously, his racial make-up has no bearing on his qualifications as President, but his dishonesty does. If he had the same ancestry, appeared white, and downplayed his black ancestry, his candidacy would have been quashed before it began. Additionally, he is an active member of an openly racist black church. This, along with his obvious lack of loyalty to the USA, make him a real nightmare. It is amazing to me that so many of our populous are so gullable that they would be willing to vote for him. The truth needs to get out to the masses.

Angela wrote a comment on March 7, 2008

I am trying to publish my prose on why I, as a true YOUNG DEMOCRAT, do not support Obama. I believe our party has been hijiked by this man and his “Obamacan” followers. Democrats are not voting in the majority for this person. It is these so-called independent who are ALWAYS for whatever the prevailing wind blows in. So, without my further ado, my essay on why I don’t support Obama.

I am for progressive values and ideals. I am for bringing people together to create a better future. But, I am NOT for Obama. I do not support someone whose entire campaign has been based on a speech they made as a state Senator in the comforts of their chambers. A speech is not a vote. Obama never even cast a vote on the resolution and if he had been in the Senate, his current voting record suggests that he would have voted “present.” I do not see him having the courage of Kucinich or Feingold. I highly doubt that his squeaky clean rhetoric that was spouted in Illinois would be so bold if he had REALLY been an elected member of the Senate.

I DO NOT support a man who talks about race in the most subtle and unsubtle ways in order to drum up votes. He does this when he specifically refers to race in his speeches. “This is not about being black or white” is specifically using race and it makes him the black candidate or “the one” (quote from Oprah) rather than a well grounded candidate reaching out to people. His cadence in his speeches, especially in high minority areas and ESPECIALLY in the South is that of a southern black preacher. It is so pronounced and obvious that he’s trying to be the “black” candidate that he goes so far as to mispronounce America! However when he’s interviewed this “accent” or cadence completely disappears. I believe this is just more of the facade of Obama.

I feel it is extremely unfortunate and disgusting that Obama has chosen to sink to these lows especially after we just had a minority candidate emulate how to run for a national office as a real uniter rather than this psuedo uniter that Barack Obama is. The best example of this minority candidate was Harold Ford Jr. His campaign was about platform and ideas. He ran without EVER talking about race and without ever talking about NOT talking about race. Obama has not done this. I find it disgusting and painful that Obama continues to trump around “race” within his speeches. His own actions have caused the divisiveness in the campaign. It’s time for him to get over his own racial issues and run as a grounded candidate with a platform rather than the African American political messiah!

I further do not support a candidate who cannot present specific ideas on any issue. This is dangerous to the country. We, the voters, do not know what to hold Obama accountable for when he only stands for “change”. Guess what, we will have change no matter who wins the election. What type of change we want, how we want that change, and when we want the change should be the dictating factors of selecting a nominee; not that the nominee will bring about change.

I do not support a candidate who uses living in Indonesia for four years as a child as a base for having the best international relations policies. He specifically stated this on November 19, 2007 at a speech in Iowa. Personally, after I traveled over seas to two different countries and hosted international camp counselors from literally all over the world, I find it insulting that Obama assumes to have a complete worldview understanding based on his experiences as a 6-10 year old boy! He would have done better to claim that he has limited international experience or to point to something, anything that he has done as an adult, espeically as an elected officer. But, to reach so far as to insinuate that he had the skills as a baby to internalize his experiences for his future presidency represents the height of arrogance and an arrogant president is NOT what this country needs in the next term!

I am not for a candidate who has so little to stand on that they give any progressive ideals away by claiming that they will include all Republicans. This is naive of Obama. Does he actually believe that without a veto-proof legislative majority that the Republicans actually want to work with him? He is not a political god and the Republicans actually have very little motivation to meet his goals because he’s already said that he’s basically willing to go meet theirs. This is not acceptable out of a candidate who is seeking the Democratic Party nomination.

Lastly, I, as a registered Young Democrat am sickened and insulted by Obama’s comment that “I know that if I get the nomination her people would support me because I’m the Democrat, but I don’t think that I can say that my supporters could support her should she be the nominee.” That was said on the same day that Michelle Obama said on Good Morning America that she just didn’t know if she could support Hillary should she get the nomination. This type of rhetoric and attitude is actually dividing our party and will be the same kind of attitude to divide this country.

It’s time to STOP giving Obama a free pass because people either want to feel like they’re on a perpetual feel-good honeymoon or because they feel that it’s wrong or not politically correct to question the African American candidate. Obama needs to answer questions, take a real stand, stop using the race card, stop trying to channel the cadences of previous black leaders like MLK, stop using the party as his personal vehicle for divisiveness while running for the party’s nomination, stop talking about how bad superdelegates are in public while viciously “working” them in private (especially the black superdelegates), and to stop giving away any progressive position by saying that he will work with any and all Republicans anywhere at any time.

seenallheard wrote a comment on March 14, 2008

So what is so wrong with the ministers comments here?

“We bombed Hiroshima, we bombed Nagasaki, and we nuked far more than the thousands in New York and the Pentagon, and we never batted an eye,” he said. “We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans, and now we are indignant. Because the stuff we have done overseas has now brought right back into our own front yards. America’s chickens are coming home to roost.”

It is the truth. For those of you are so-called minority you have no concept of this truth. Ask people around the world about americas crimes. I am a citizen, born here and have witnessed police terrorism. Africans in America and Native Americans have experience state sponsored terrorism since the inception of this country. Other coutries have experienced such terror as well. It is evident. One cannot argue these facts unless you are a racist.

Christians Against Obama's Lies wrote a comment on March 16, 2008

Who is Senator Obama trying to fool? Now he wants to do damage control by denouncing his pastor, but he still attends church there. I am SHOCKED that it took over a month for Senator Obama to finally say something about his pastor. This is the same pastor that Senator Obama supports through his regular tithing! The Senator’s family donates thousand of dollars to this church annually. That means he support his pastor’s RACIAL overtones and revolutionary statements of overthrowing America. Who does Senator Obama trying to fool and what is he trying to hide? Why is he openly, freely, and devotedly donated all that money to a cause if he doesn’t believe in it? Why is Senator Obama lying to America? This is as bad as Senator Obama still accepting all that money from his crooked land developer that he supposedly hasn’t seen nor talked to in years? HE’S JUST TRYING TO DO THIS BECAUSE HE NEEDS THE CHRISTIAN VOTE! HOW CAN HE CALL HIMSELF A CHRISTIAN WHEN HE SUPPORTS A CHURCH THAT OPENLY PREACHES THE DESTRUCTION OF AMERICA AND CHRISTIANITY! GO TO HIS CHURCH WEBSITE AND SEE FOR YOURSELF!

Keith wrote a comment on March 23, 2008

A VOTE FOR OBAMA IS A VOTE FOR RACISM

Barak HUSSEIN Obama refused to repudiate the remarks of his pastor of 20 years, stating that the pastor is a reflection of the old standard of racism that existed in this country for many years which has angered so many blacks.

This pastor, Rev. Wright, is a megalomaniac who not only is anti-U.S., but an antisemite. He awarded Louis Farrakahn a MAN OF THE YEAR award, knowing that Farrakahn is a Black-Muslim and an avowed antisemite. Rev. Wriight is anti-Israel and believes that our country “deserved 9-11” because we bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Initially, Obama claimed he did not know what was going on in the church that HE chose and attended for 20 years, that he was ignorant of the horrific ideas his pastor spewed from his pulpit. Rev. Wright married Obama, christened his children and serves as his spiritual advisor – to this very day. He was also Obama’s political advisor until this week, when he made a hasty departure.

Now that Rev. Wright’s ideas and Obama’s relationship to him has been made public, Obama still stands by him, saying that Rev. Wright is “like family to me.” He also says that, over the years, some of Wright’s ideas were repugnant to him. He does not explain why he continued to attend this church over the years or why he still supports Rev. Wright. OR, why he exposed his young children to Wriight’s vitriolic rhetoric week after week.

This is JUDGMENT? Of a potential presidential candidate?

Obama has revealed the deep feeling of estrangement from the white community that Blacks feel. He is committed to preferential treatment for Blacks (affirmative action) in schools and on the job. He does not understand that these very beliefs are racist in nature. These actions continue the myth that Blacks are “not as good” as others and need help in obtaining positions in schools or in the job market. Blacks who are pro-affirmative action continue to complain and demand much more than they have earned because of America’s “racist” past.

Most realistic Blacks today are against affirmative action, stating that they should be “good enough to earn” their place(s) in our society. The majority of people in our society have put racism behind them (or made an honest attempt to do so) but, unfortunately, Blacks have not been able to do so. Neither has Obama.

Must we award Obama our highest office, the presidency, to prove we are not racist?

And, as Obama admitted in his speech today, “I am a product of my past.” He will NOT be able to make realistic impartial judgments as our President because his own past experiences (including his relationship with his chosen Rev. Wright), without exposing himself as the racist person that he is, whether conscious or unconscious.

Keep America moving in the right direction. Do not support a racist, whether Black or white.
Obama has come close to fooling millions for months, but that time is now past. He is NOT the right man at this time, for he is polarizing his party and the whole country.

Steve Daniels wrote a comment on March 24, 2008

A MUSLIM IN THE WHITE HOUSE ?

Barak Hussein Obama is a very intelligent individual. This is how he came to be a U.S. Senator. He knows very well what most of This Nation suspects of him. He knows the best way to avoid problems is to associate himself with Catholicism as much as possible.

Although Obama has never stated outright that he is not a Muslim, he most definitely has done a splendid job of always associating himself with Catholicism. Someone has to and should ask him directly and in public, “Are you a Muslim”? We need to know this answer.

Now, let us assume that Obama wins the presidential election. Will Obama be willing to take the oath of office as it is written? It is specified in The Constitution that the President Elect must take an oath of office. The constitution also specifies the words to be used for the oath. Please do not forget that Obama has refused to wear an American Flag pin on his lapel. Also, while among a group of people pledging allegiance to our flag, he refused to join in with them. He just stood there with his hands by his side and his mouth silent. What does all of this mean? He does have his own mind about how things should be or not be. As President Elect, would Obama attempt to add his own words to what is already specified for the oath of office? Even more shocking, how would you feel if he decided to accept the Presidency and attempt to not be sworn into office even though it is required as specified by The Constitution? As President, with his mind so independent in thought and belief, is this the type of man that would have the capacity to listen and understand the wishes and desires of The People?

Here is a big question. Let us assume that he is willing to be sworn into office in the normal manner with the normal statements and words. Do you think he would place his hand on the Holy Bible or would he place his hand on the Koran? It would be his choice and he would have the perfect right to select the Koran rather than The Holy Bible.

A new issue has now been raised. Obama, in his attempt to associate himself to Catholicism as much as possible, states that he has attended The Trinity United Church of Christ for twenty years. He never said, “the last twenty years”. In fact, he stated in one of his speeches, “The man I met more than twenty years ago is a man who helped introduce me to my Christian faith …..” . This implies that his membership to the church may have ended a long time ago. Nevertheless, during the twenty years he did attend The Trinity United Church of Christ, he heard the sermons of Rev. Jeremiah Wright. A clip of one of Rev. Wright’s sermons was shown on television. It is now known that Rev. Wright is, very much, anti-American. We now know that Obama has been listening to these kinds of sermons for twenty years. What is the probability that this anti-Americanism would rub off on a growing young man. It has already been reported on radio that Obama has a hatred for The United States. This would fit in very well with the fact that he was taught anti-Americanism while growing up in the church.

Obama has televised his disdain with Rev. Wright’s sermons. It seems that it would be easy for Obama to show disdain with a Catholic clergyman if he were a Muslim. Conversely, if Obama is truly Catholic, he would find it extremely difficult, if not impossible, to talk against Rev. Wright.

Yes, absolutely, a Muslim should be able to be President of The United States just as Protestants were for most of American history. There is one very big problem with this right now. The Islamic religion has fostered a fanatic faction to itself. There are fanatic Muslims all over the world. Many of them are here in The United States. Let us not forget about all the anti-American bombings over the past dozen years. Let us not forget that when the Islamic religion brought down the Twin Towers, footage was shown on TV with joyous Muslims dancing in the streets and this was just here, in The United States.

I do not know if Obama is a Muslim or not. Nevertheless, it would be inappropriate, at this time, for a Muslim to hold residency in The White House. It might possibly be OK if a Muslim held the presidency in, let’s say, fifteen or twenty years but not right now. If we found ourselves with a Muslim in the White House in 2009, the entire world would laugh at us and we would look like fools. Is this what we want? Is this what you want?

Please talk to your friends and family about the possible scenarios presented above. Also, communicate these possibilities with various Internet political forums in as many States as you can contact; especially those States that have not yet voted. Also, contact various radio talk shows and raise these possible issues.

May The Lord be with us.

Steve
Lexington, MA
The birthplace of American freedom and liberty

eggroll wrote a comment on March 25, 2008

When I think of Obama and his supporters like Jessy Jackson, Pastor Wright, Al Sharpton and others I think of Mayor Dinkins of New York , and most of these guys that are Obama supporters. When Mr. Dinkins was mayor, Dinkins and these guys like sharpton and Jackson terrorized the entire NYC. Everyone were fleeing from NYC. I imagine If Obama become president everyone would be fleeing from America to other nations. However, with nuclear weapons in Obama and his supporters hand, I am not sure if fleeing from America would guarantee people safety. People should realize if Obama and his supporters become president, these guys would have thousands of nuclear weapons in their control; and they should ask themselves if they would trust placing all these nuclear weapons in these guys hand before they vote for them.

Robert Shey wrote a comment on March 26, 2008

The Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright land transaction at http://www.webofdeception.com

Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright land transaction from his Jeremiah Wright Trust to Trinity Church.
Land is at: (Odyssey Country Club)

Kenneth Lewis sells the land to Wright and then Wright sells it to the church.A
ten million dollar mortgage and 8.2% interest rate .

[…] About this Anti Obama blog […]

CW wrote a comment on March 28, 2008

This new religion of Obamanity is creating disciples by the millions who worship at the feet of their new Messiah. He can do no wrong. He is perfection.

Disciple Halle Berry has said, “I’ll do whatever he says to do. I’ll collect paper cups off the ground to make his pathway clear.”

Disciple and alleged “journalist” Chris Matthews has said, “This is bigger than Kennedy. . . . This is the New Testament.”

Disciple Oprah says, “We’re here to evolve to a higher plane . . . he is an evolved leader . . . [he] has an ear for eloquence and a Tongue dipped in the Unvarnished Truth.”

And disciple Jesse Jackson has said, “He’s running a theological campaign…At some point, he took off his arms and grew wings.”

The virtual deification of this man is sickening and alarming. A Google search of “Obama messiah” currently returns 280,000 pages.

Sen. Obama has repeatedly preached from his public pulpit the phrase, “Don’t tell me words don’t matter”, yet has a life history of cultivating personal and professional relationships with men who’s words are vile, hateful, racist, bigoted, and downright evil.

A black man as President of the United States could be a fine thing. Just not THIS black man.

But what do I know? These are merely the ramblings of - in the words of a racist - a “typical white person.”

Kathy wrote a comment on March 29, 2008

I am writing in Hillary Clinton in November, when I vote. I am very scared of Barack Obama. HE seems to have a power over the media that is frightening—could he be the Anti-Christ…or something worse? I’m really scared…

Oxy Moran wrote a comment on April 1, 2008

Hi guys,

Great to see your well-presented Obama-Slammer site!

I will be linking y’all’s site to my site “Debunking Obama”

and hope you will consider linking back to me at

http://obamawtf.blogspot.com

God Bless America

Oxy Moran

drzz wrote a comment on April 3, 2008

Stop Obama !

See this video
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ueI-vlcaqGY

Paul Haas wrote a comment on April 11, 2008

I have searched and found no record of Obama having served in the military.
When Kerry (The war hero?) ran against Bush, the liberals were all over Bush for only being in the guard.
Now we have a genuine war hero running against a person who has not served a day in the service and the silence from the libs is deafening.

Urban Suburban wrote a comment on April 24, 2008

Obama isn’t what troubles me so much as his uncritical followers. I watch his speeches and I’m about as moved as a rock on a windless day. I simply don’t get it.

ObamaTheCarSalesman wrote a comment on April 26, 2008

Another site for “true Obama” information:

http://www.hellnobama.com

jack sigil wrote a comment on May 8, 2008

The White National forum “Stormfront” recently took a poll as to who the members would vote for:

Obama–27%
Clinton 25%
McCain -48%

Over 50% of so-called white racists, (although none of them has ever done anything tocompare to the destruction wrought by black muslims and black liberation theology churches) are voying fot Obama…..The usual reason? “He hates Jews and we do too!”

jack sigil wrote a comment on May 8, 2008

Black liberation theology has taken over the leftist Unitarian Church.

Rev. William G. Sinkford, President of the Unitarian Universalist Association- is a Black Liberation Theology minister and a virulent afroracist.

Howard wrote a comment on May 30, 2008

My fellow Americans …
It’s time to start voting the Obama super delegates out of office.
http://demconwatch.blogspot.com/2008/01/superdelegate-list.html

Dave wrote a comment on June 8, 2008

To Whom It May Concern,

I wanted to inform you about another website called http://www.obama-wire.com that is devoted to breaking the media’s generous spotlight on the Obama campaign. I think together our sites are trying to achieve the same goal–not getting Sen. Obama elected, and I also think together we can get closer to achieving our goal. It is in this mindset that I respectfully request you to add my website’s link to your blog.

Cheers,
Dave

Howard wrote a comment on June 21, 2008

Obama’s proposal of CHANGE requires sound judgement to determine which things should change, and which things should be kept, cherished and embraced. Unfortunately Obama and his left wing supporters want to throw out the baby with the dirty bath water. They have no appreciation of U.S. history, or the blood, sweat, and sacrifice it’s taken to make America the greatest country in the world. They seem to believe that before you can create change, first you must discredit, or destroy everything that’s come before. Obama relies on young voters apathy and ignorance of American history and tradition, which makes it easier for them to buy into CHANGE, without any sense of what kind of change is needed. Evidence of this, is Obama supporters embracing his disrespectful alteration of the Presidential seal, to further his personal ambition. Or, Obama’s black liberation church discrediting Thomas Jefferson, because of an alleged affair with a black slave. If Obama is elected President, I predict that America will become barely recognizable.

chuck wrote a comment on June 23, 2008

14

I am a conservative to but unfortunately we live in a country with a two party system. We live in a two party system where the party we thought held our conservative views has failed us.

We have an unjust, elective war in Iraq that is bankrupting our treasury, a skyrocketing budget and an attack on our civil liberties. All of these things can be laid squarely on the feet of the Republican party since this party alone controlled both houses of congress for the first 6 years of the Republcan executive adminstration.

The Republican party stands alone in its responsibility for the sorry state our country is in right now. Its unfortunate that you choose to blindly and dogmatically attack the only other option we have, even going as far as printing out right lies, like the story about Michelle Obama’s princeton Thesis.

We dont need dogma and blind adherence to parties right now. Right now we need reasoned healthy and honest discourse. Discourse that respects the facts and doesnt blindly and knowing promote lies.

KEVIN WRIGHT wrote a comment on June 26, 2008

12For those who slept through World History 101…here is a condensed
version.
Humans originally existed as members of small bands of nomadic
hunters/gatherers. They lived on deer in the mountains during the summer
and would go to the coast and live on fish and lobster in the winter.
The two most important events in all of history were:
1. The invention of beer, and
2. The invention of the wheel.
The wheel was invented to get man to the beer, and the beer to the man.
These facts formed the foundation of modern civilization and together were
the catalyst for the splitting of humanity into two distinct subgroups:
1. Liberals.
2. Conservatives.
Once beer was discovered, it required grain and that was the beginning of
agriculture. Neither the glass bottle nor aluminum can were invented yet,
so while our early humans were sitting around waiting for them to be
invented, they just stayed close to the brewery. That’s how villages were
formed.
Some men spent their days tracking and killing animals to BB Q at night
while they were drinking beer. This was the beginning of what is known as
the Conservative movement.
Other men who were weaker and less skilled at hunting learned to live off
the conservatives by showing up for the nightly BBQ’s and doing the
sewing, fetching, and hair dressing. This was the beginning of the Liberal
movement.
Some of these liberal men eventually evolved into women. The rest became
known as girlie-men.
Some noteworthy liberal achievements include the domestication of cats,
the invention of group therapy and group hugs, the evolution of the
Hollywood actor, and the concept of Democratic voting to decide how to
divide all the meat and beer that conservatives provided.
Over the years, Conservatives came to be symbolized by the largest, most
powerful land animal on earth, the elephant. Liberals are symbolized by
the jackass.
Modern liberals like imported beer (with lime added), but most prefer
white wine or imported bottled water. They eat raw fish but like their
beef well done. Sushi, tofu, and French food are standard liberal fare.
Another interesting evolutionary side note: most of liberal women have
higher testosterone levels than their men.
Most social workers, personal injury attorneys, journalists, dreamers in
Hollywood and group therapists are liberals. Liberals invented the
designated hitter rule because it wasn’t fair to make the pitcher also
bat.
Conservatives drink domestic beer. They eat red meat and still provide for
their women. Conservatives are big-game hunters, rodeo cowboys,
lumberjacks, construction workers, firemen, medical doctors, police
officers, corporate executives, athletes, Marines, and generally anyone
who works productively. Conservatives who own companies hire other
conservatives who want to work for a living.
Liberals produce little or nothing. They like to govern the producers and
decide what to do with the production. Liberals believe Europeans are more
enlightened than Americans. That is why most of the liberals remained in
Europe when conservatives were coming to America. They crept in after the
Wild West was tamed and created a business of trying to get more for
nothing.
Here ends today’s lesson in world history…….
It should be noted that a liberal may have a momentary urge to angrily
respond to the above before forwarding it.
A conservative will simply laugh and be so convinced of the absolute truth
of this history that it will be forwarded immediately to other true
believers, and to more liberals…just to piss them off.
Have a great day!

ron smith wrote a comment on July 9, 2008

Obama-Won’t drill for oil (We won’t burn more, would just cost less).
Won’t try nuclear energy.
Wants to raise taxes.
Inexperienced
Bad judgement
Has the most left winged record in the senate.
Wants to talk to Iran right off the bat.
Is Muslim, unpatriotic, and his wife? who wants to bring down America.
Is getting a free ride from the media.
His plans are more expensive than Clinton or McCain’s.
Has flip-flopped on public funding, the washington dc gun law,
& Rev. Wright

Lee wrote a comment on July 10, 2008

ALOHA LITTLE KAHONIES
We should all chip in to buy Jesse a small pair of clippers … after which, he’d have a couple of little items to raffle off in the next Obama fund raiser. We need a President with BIG KAHONIES … elect Senator John McCain President in November.

Mr Jag wrote a comment on July 11, 2008

Just curious if there are enough people like Wright and Jesse Jackson to keep undermining Obama. Let’s hope the train wreck keeps moving down the tracks.

Joe DeFacate` wrote a comment on July 15, 2008

And don’t forget he is also a Chicago politician. You know– “Vote early and often”.

Gina wrote a comment on July 16, 2008

America may be ready for a black president, but does that mean we are obligated to elect someone president, just because they are black? Obama has extremely minimal experience and minimal credentials, not to mention his 20 years joined at the hip with anti-American racists. Also, about 15% of our population is black, so in a democracy, why are the other 85% of us made to feel obligated to elect a black man? I think the problems confronting America today are too dire and too complex to elect someone who is less qualified, just because it is politically correct.

Lee wrote a comment on July 25, 2008

Upon reading many of the blogs posted here, I must clarify something.
Most Americans agree with the lofty words and visions for world peace that Obama so eloquently pontificates in his speeches … It’s Obama we don’t trust. those of you who hypnotically fawn over Obama take everything he says as gospel. But, you don’t even know the man. You assume that because his words are worthy, he is trustworthy. People they are just words! Obama, the man who is speaking those words has a horrible track record. He did nothing as a senator. He spent the last 20 years accepting an anti-American racist as his mentor. His associations have been with extremely unsavory people. However, you Obamabots keep trying to characterize the rest of us as disagreeing with what Obama says … when it’s Obama himself we don’t trust … nor should you!

Charles wrote a comment on August 2, 2008

Obama doesn’t want restitution on slavery. And do you know why most blacks don’t want a final restitution on the slavery thing? Because the government would make them sign something that they could never bring it up again. And what fun would that be. As long as you keep a little snake in ya pocket, it’s perfectly alright to carry a big bottle of snake bite medicine in ya pocket. Restitution would kill the snake.

Care to comment?

Please add the middle two numbers
4 and 6 and 2 and 6